Many teams launch features based on gut feelings rather than data, but most of our assumptions about customers' preferences turn out to be wrong. Betting person or not, that’s not a statistic you want to risk when shipping products.
Experimentation tools solve this problem by allowing you to test features before a full rollout. However, choosing the right platform is easier said than done. Some tools treat experimentation as separate from development workflows and force engineers to context-switch between feature flags and A/B testing platforms. Others focus heavily on marketing use cases but lack the statistical strictness that data teams need.
In our opinion, the best experimentation tools integrate directly into your development lifecycle. They let engineers use the same feature flags for both deployment safety and running experiments, while giving product managers insights to ship winning variations immediately.
Experimentation doesn't happen in a vacuum, though. It takes a stack of integrated tools working together—some that run A/B tests, some that provide analytics, and others that surface user feedback to inform what to test next.
Below, we’ll walk you through the full ecosystem of tools product teams use to run smarter experiments. These aren’t just statistical engines. They’re the tools that make end-to-end experimentation successful.
What are experimentation tools?
Experimentation tools let you test different versions of features with real users. They're controlled testing environments that validate whether code changes actually improve metrics before full rollout.
These platforms handle a few core functions:
- A/B and multivariate testing: Split users into groups and serve different variations.
- Feature targeting: Control which users see features based on factors like geography or behavior.
- Statistical analysis: Calculate whether metric differences are actually significant.
- Real-time configuration: Change parameters and roll out winners without code deploys.
Experimentation tools fall into two categories:
- Standalone platforms focus exclusively on A/B testing and analytics but require separate integrations with feature flags, CI/CD pipelines, and deployment tools.
- Integrated solutions combine experimentation with feature management by using the same feature flags for both safe deployments and running experiments.
Ultimately, standalone tools treat experimentation as separate from development workflows, while integrated platforms make it part of your standard deployment process.This distinction also connects to client-side vs. server-side experimentation. Standalone platforms often lean on client-side methods (running tests in the browser or app), which can be faster to set up but risk performance issues and data skew. Integrated solutions typically emphasize server-side experimentation, embedding tests deeper into deployment pipelines for cleaner data and tighter control over rollouts.
Basic feature flags are simple on/off switches for enabling functionality without code changes. Experimentation platforms build on this by adding statistical analysis, user segmentation, and automated traffic allocation. They turn feature flags into controlled experiments that measure business impact.
For example, a basic feature flag controls whether users see a new checkout flow. An experimentation platform lets you do split testing traffic between old and new flows, tracks conversion rates for each group, and determines which drives more purchases.
The best approach is an integrated solution: engineers use feature flags for deployment safety, then layer on experiments to validate whether features improve user experience and business outcomes.
Why product teams need experimentation tools
Building features without validation wastes engineering resources and risks damaging the customer experience. When organizations are wrong most of the time when they trust their gut about customer preferences, something has got to change. Even companies like Microsoft find that only one-third of their feature ideas actually improve KPIs when put to the test.
Teams fall into common traps if they don’t use experimentation: spending weeks building features that don't move conversion rates, shipping changes that hurt retention, or making product decisions based on the loudest voice in the room (rather than user behavior data). These failures compound quickly—a feature that reduces conversion by just 2% can cost millions in lost revenue.
Experimentation tools fix this by enabling experimentation at the speed of delivery. Modern software teams deploy multiple times per day, and experimentation needs to match that pace. The best platforms let you wrap any feature in an experiment, deploy safely behind feature flags, then measure real impact with live users.
Teams can test small changes continuously, compound improvements over time, and avoid the big-bang releases (that tend to fail). Companies that practice continuous experimentation see up to 20% annual improvements in conversion rates just from optimizing existing features.
The goal is better decisions and faster learning cycles. Integrated experimentation helps teams validate assumptions within days instead of months, ship winning variations immediately, and allocate engineering resources to features that actually drive business outcomes.
How to choose the right experimentation tools
Not all experimentation platforms are built the same. The right choice will depend on how well the tool integrates with your existing development workflow and whether it can scale with your team's needs. Here are the factors to consider:
- Workflow integration and feature flag support: How well does the tool fit into your CI/CD pipeline and development process?
- Statistical engine and metric flexibility: Can you trust the results and measure what matters to your business?
- Real-time rollouts and governance: How quickly can you act on experiment results while maintaining control?
- SDK coverage and performance impact: Will the tool work across your tech stack without degrading the digital experience?
- Cost and total ROI: What's the actual cost of implementation and ongoing operation?
Workflow integration and feature flag support
Your experimentation tool should integrate directly into your development workflow. Look for platforms that use the same feature flags for both deployment safety and running experiments. This lets engineers deploy code behind flags, then add on experiments without additional instrumentation.
Avoid tools that require separate SDKs for feature flags and experimentation. Also, ignore platforms that bypass your standard development process with visual editors. These just create friction and make it harder to maintain code quality standards.
Statistical engine and metric flexibility
Your platform should support both Bayesian and frequentist statistical models—this gives you flexibility in how you analyze test results. Double-check that you can define custom metrics that align with your business objectives (not just default conversion tracking).
Black-box statistical engines that don't explain their methodology inevitably create trust issues with data teams. And can you blame them? Look for platforms that provide transparent calculations, confidence intervals, and the ability to export raw data for deeper analysis.
Real-time rollouts and governance
When an experiment shows positive results, you should be able to roll out the winning variation immediately without code changes. At the same time, teams need governance controls for compliance and change management. Look for audit trails, approval workflows, and guardrail features that automatically stop experiments if target metrics degrade.
SDK coverage and performance impact
Check whether the platform supports your entire tech stack: frontend, backend, mobile, and any edge computing environments. Inconsistent SDK coverage forces teams to use multiple tools or skip experimentation for certain features.
Performance matters, too. Experimentation SDKs should have minimal impact on page load times, shouldn't cause layout shifts, and need to handle network failures gracefully. Poor performance will skew experiment results (and hurt user experience).
Cost and total ROI
Sure, you’ve got the license fees, but don’t forget about time to implement, ongoing maintenance overhead, and whether you'll need additional data infrastructure. Some platforms require separate data warehouses, custom analytics pipelines, or dedicated data science resources.
While it’s hard to know all the costs that might be hiding, think about: engineering time for custom integrations, delayed insights from complex setup processes, or the need to hire specialists to interpret results. Ultimately, your experimentation should be adding value (not just data).
Tools that power a complete experimentation workflow
Effective experimentation is a culture, not just a tactic. The tools below cover different pieces of a comprehensive experimentation ecosystem—from the core platform that manages feature flags and A/B tests, to complementary tools that provide qualitative insights, user feedback, and behavioral analytics.
Together, they help teams build the data-driven decision-making culture that separates high-performing product organizations from those that ship based on assumptions.
1. LaunchDarkly (experimentation platform)
LaunchDarkly makes implementation part of your standard development process rather than bolting A/B testing onto your existing workflow. You're already using feature flags for safe deployments and kill switches, so why not use those same flags to run experiments? That's the core idea behind the LaunchDarkly platform.
Your engineers deploy code behind feature flags like they normally would, then product managers can turn those flags into experiments without any additional instrumentation. When you find a winning variation through product analytics and session recordings, you can roll it out to 100% of users instantly (no code changes, no waiting for the next deployment cycle).
However, if you're a small team that just needs basic A/B testing software, the platform can feel like overkill. And while LaunchDarkly has a solid statistical engine, data teams coming from specialized experimentation tools might miss some of the more advanced analytics features.
Still, if you want to integrate experimentation directly into your development lifecycle rather than treating it as a separate workflow, LaunchDarkly is pretty much the only platform built specifically for that approach.
Some teams also use standalone experimentation platforms like Statsig, Eppo, or Amplitude Experiment. These tools are great for teams with dedicated data scientists who want advanced statistical configurations, but they often demand separate setups from your feature management platform—and that slows down time-to-test.
If you're aiming to integrate experimentation directly into your engineering workflow, LaunchDarkly is the better fit.
2. UserTesting (qualitative feedback)
UserTesting approaches product validation through video interviews with real users. LaunchDarkly tells you what users do through quantitative experiments, and UserTesting shows you why they do it by letting you watch them interact with your product in real time.
The platform connects you with participants who match your target demographics, then records them completing tasks or answering questions about your product. You get to see exactly where users get confused, what they expect to happen, and how they navigate your interface. When an A/B test shows one variation performing better, UserTesting helps you understand why.
Use LaunchDarkly to run quantitative experiments that measure conversion rates or engagement, then dive deeper with UserTesting to understand user motivations and identify new hypotheses to test.
3. FullStory (behavioral analytics)
FullStory records everything users do on your website or app. This creates a searchable database of user sessions that you can replay to watch in detail. It’s qualitative validation to your quantitative experiments—while your A/B tests show you which variation wins, FullStory shows you exactly how users behave with each variation.
When you see unexpected results in LaunchDarkly, you can search FullStory for sessions that match your experiment criteria and watch exactly what went wrong. Maybe users are clicking on elements that aren't clickable, or they're getting confused by a design change that looks good in mockups but breaks user expectations in practice.
FullStory helps you track details you'd never think to measure. You can set up funnels to track user journeys, create heatmaps to see where people click, and even set up alerts when users exhibit frustrating behaviors (like rage clicking).
4. Productboard (feature prioritization)
Productboard is a product management platform focused on collecting and prioritizing feature requests. LaunchDarkly handles the testing and rollout of features, but Productboard helps you figure out what features are worth testing in the first place.
The platform aggregates feedback from customer support tickets, sales calls, user interviews, and direct feature requests, then helps product teams identify patterns and prioritize what to build next. You can see which features are most requested by your highest-value customers, track how requests correlate with churn or expansion revenue, and build a data-driven roadmap based on user needs (rather than internal assumptions).
Use Productboard to identify high-impact features that customers are asking for, then test those features with LaunchDarkly before full rollout. This combo-approach helps you avoid building features that nobody wants while double-checking that the features you do build solve real user problems. It makes the difference between experimenting on random ideas and testing hypotheses backed by customer feedback.
5. Mixpanel (behavioral analytics)
Mixpanel provides event-based product analytics that track every interaction users have with your product. While LaunchDarkly runs the experiments, Mixpanel provides the deep behavioral analytics to understand what's driving your results.
You can see whether users convert in your experiment and how their behavior changes over weeks or months.
Did that new onboarding flow improve long-term retention? Are users who experienced your experimental feature more likely to upgrade to paid plans?
Mixpanel's cohort analysis and retention tracking can answer these questions.
Most A/B testing platforms focus on simple conversion rates, but Mixpanel lets you create smart metrics like "users who completed three key actions within their first week" or "time to value for new signups." You can then view these metrics in LaunchDarkly to measure what drives long-term business outcomes rather than just short-term conversions.
How to evaluate experimentation tools (checklist)
When you're sitting down to evaluate these platforms, it's easy to get caught up in feature lists and pricing charts. But the questions that really matter are about how the tool will work with your team's day-to-day workload:
Can engineers and PMs collaborate without bottlenecks?
Look for tools that let both teams work in their preferred environments. Engineers should be able to deploy code normally while PMs configure experiments through a user-friendly interface. If every experiment requires engineering handoffs or PMs need to learn complex technical configurations, it’s probably not the right fit.
Can you run tests on any feature type: frontend, backend, mobile, or AI prompts?
Don't assume every platform handles your full stack. Some tools are great at frontend web experiments but struggle with mobile apps or backend logic. If you're building AI features, make sure the platform can handle model configurations and prompt testing.
Are insights accessible and trustworthy for both product and data teams?
Product managers need clear results that they can quickly understand. Data teams need transparent methodology and the ability to dig deeper into raw data. Tools that only serve one audience will only create tension between teams.
Does the tool support real-time changes and rollouts without new code deploys?
This is where the feature flag integration matters. If you find a winning experiment but need to wait for your next deployment to implement it, you're missing the whole point of rapid iteration. The best platforms let you go from experiment results to full rollout in minutes instead of days.
Can it integrate with your existing data infrastructure (Snowflake, Segment)?
Check whether the platform plays nicely with your current analytics stack. Some tools make you send data to their systems first, then export it back to your warehouse. Others let you keep everything in your existing infrastructure. The wrong choice here creates data silos or doubles your storage costs.
Can you scale experimentation across teams while maintaining governance?
Your experimentation program will inevitably grow, and you'll need controls around who can create experiments, approval workflows for high-impact tests, and audit trails for compliance. Platforms that work great for small teams sometimes fall apart when you try to scale them across an entire organization.
Why LaunchDarkly is the best fit for product teams
Most product teams fight the same battles: stretched engineering resources, weeks-long feedback loops, and fragmented toolchains that make simple workflows maddeningly complex. Traditional experimentation platforms make these problems worse by treating A/B testing as a separate discipline from feature delivery.
The LaunchDarkly engineering-native approach solves these problems. Instead of learning analytics-driven tools that bypass your development workflow, your team uses the same feature flags for both safe deployments and experimentation. Engineers deploy behind flags, product managers configure experiments, and winning variations go live instantly.
Everybody wins.
Companies like Vestiaire Collective and Savage X Fenty don't just run more experiments with LaunchDarkly: they ship and learn faster. When Vestiaire Collective's team finds a conversion optimization that works, they can roll it out to all users within minutes. That's the difference between continuous improvement and periodic big launches.
The platform unifies what most teams manage with separate tools: feature flags, progressive rollouts, A/B testing, and production monitoring. Fewer tools means less context-switching, cleaner data pipelines, and engineers who can focus on building instead of managing integrations. For product teams that want to move fast without breaking things, that integration is everything.
See for yourself. Sign up now for a free trial, or schedule a demo with our team.
Like what you read?
Get a demo
